Multinational Firms’ Location and the New Economic Geography
Show Less

Multinational Firms’ Location and the New Economic Geography

Edited by Jean-Louis Mucchielli and Thierry Mayer

This book analyses how foreign direct investors choose their locations, whilst exploring the forces which shape international economic geography. Although these two issues are, to some extent, inter-related, researchers have only recently acknowledged the similarity of economic geography and international business approaches to the empirical assessment of likely causes of the degree of spatial concentration observed in many modern industries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Trade liberalization and the internal geography of countries

Matthieu Crozet and Pamina Koenig-Soubeyran


Matthieu Crozet and Pamina Koenig-Soubeyran INTRODUCTION 5.1 The need to restructure a large number of European policies before launching the final part of the enlargement of the European Union (EU) gathers consensus among European policy-makers. One of the areas of European action to which particular attention will be directed is that of the European regional policies, and two new sources of European funding have already been created specifically for these countries in order to finance regional development. In this context, it appears relevant to go one step further and to analyse the link between the economic integration of the Central and Eastern European countries (CEECs) with the EU and the economic geography of these countries: how does trade liberalization have an impact on regional development patterns within countries? The relation between trade and the location of production inside countries has been explicitly studied by recent models of the new economic geography literature, based on the original model of Krugman (1991). Indeed, Krugman and Livas (1996), in a two-country three-region framework, suggest that a decrease in international transaction costs between two countries may foster the dispersion of economic activity inside the home country. Conversely, Alonso-Villar (2001), Monfort and Nicolini (2000) and Paluzie (2001), respectively in a three-country, two-country four-region, and in a two-country three-region framework, show that trade liberalization is more likely to enhance agglomeration of economic activity inside the country opening to trade. Some empirical work on the topic validate Krugman and Livas’s result: Ades and Glaeser (1995) study...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.