Size and Local Democracy
Show Less

Size and Local Democracy

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose

How large should local governments be, and what are the implications of changing the scale of local governments for the quality of local democracy? These questions have stood at the centre of debates among scholars and public sector reformers alike from antiquity to the present. This monograph offers the first systematic cross-national investigation of these questions using empirical evidence gathered specifically for this purpose. Results provide insights that offer important touchstones for reform activities and academic research efforts in many countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Perceived government challenges

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose


In Chapter 1 it was argued that a well-functioning local democracy should not only allow for widespread, responsible political engagement of competent citizens. It also requires responsiveness, integrity and competence of its political officeholders, and presumes a system of government that is capable of making public policies and providing public services and facilities to the satisfaction of its citizens. Meeting these demands may be more difficult under some conditions than under others. The challenges facing local government, after all, may vary considerably. Some municipalities operate in communities with widespread unemployment, substantial welfare dependence, many broken families, high crime rates, large ethnic minorities and a low-educated population, whereas others function in areas that are more prosperous and are confronted with fewer problems. Variations in community contexts of this sort may well be reflected in citizens’ perceptions of government challenges. Such perceptions are likely to be important for at least two reasons. Where citizens perceive numerous and severe problems, it may be more difficult for the municipality to meet citizen expectations for effective public action. In situations where actual and perceived problems are pronounced, moreover, citizens may also blame local government for the pitiful state of the community. Public perceptions of local problems, in short, may affect two dimensions of democratic quality considered here – namely, the confidence of citizens in the responsiveness, integrity and competence of local political leaders, and citizen satisfaction with the performance of local government (see e.g. McAllister 1999; Miller & Listhaug 1999; Norris 1999b: 22–3).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.