Size and Local Democracy
Show Less

Size and Local Democracy

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose

How large should local governments be, and what are the implications of changing the scale of local governments for the quality of local democracy? These questions have stood at the centre of debates among scholars and public sector reformers alike from antiquity to the present. This monograph offers the first systematic cross-national investigation of these questions using empirical evidence gathered specifically for this purpose. Results provide insights that offer important touchstones for reform activities and academic research efforts in many countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Political confidence

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose


People’s confidence in elected politicians is, in the eyes of many, another indicator of the quality of democracy. Summarizing an extensive review of the literature, Wright (1981: 8), for example, noted how the proposition that ‘democratic polities require large quantities of political efficacy and trust among the citizenry is […] a commonplace among the scholars of our time’. Low levels of political confidence, the prevalent view suggested, constituted a potential danger to democracy because widespread lack of confidence could provide the basis for civic unrest and anti-democratic sentiments. The assumptions underlying this position, however, have not gone unchallenged. Wright himself argued that because of vast differences in personal backgrounds it is highly unlikely that the alienated, ‘in all their glorious diversity’, would be jointly attracted to one single common cause (e.g. an anti-democratic movement), and hence it is implausible that they will pose a serious threat to democratic stability (Wright 1981: 70; see also Sniderman 1981: 13). A negative view of low levels of political confidence has also been criticized on normative grounds. Much recent literature, in fact, is based on the idea that a critical citizenry constitutes a democratic asset, not a threat (Geissel 2005: 2–3). Joseph Nye (1999: vi), in his preface to Pippa Norris’ book Critical Citizens, for instance, argues that critical citizens are a positive asset for democracy.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.