Size and Local Democracy
Show Less

Size and Local Democracy

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose

How large should local governments be, and what are the implications of changing the scale of local governments for the quality of local democracy? These questions have stood at the centre of debates among scholars and public sector reformers alike from antiquity to the present. This monograph offers the first systematic cross-national investigation of these questions using empirical evidence gathered specifically for this purpose. Results provide insights that offer important touchstones for reform activities and academic research efforts in many countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Direct democratic participation in Switzerland

Bas Denters, Michael Goldsmith, Andreas Ladner, Poul Erik Mouritzen and Lawrence E. Rose


Democratic reforms, aimed at extending opportunities for citizen participation in local policy making have been on the public sector reform agenda in many countries in recent years (cf. Dalton et al. 2003; Denters & Rose 2005; Kersting & Vetter 2003; Schaap & Daemen 2012). Such reforms cover a wide spectrum, ranging from the provision of information, consultation and active participation based on partnerships, to binding decision making by citizens expressing their opinions through initiatives and referendums. Not all of these reforms, however, can be subsumed under the term ‘direct democracy’. The very essence of direct democracy – especially as it is practised in Switzerland – is the idea that citizens should, according to the principle of popular sovereignty, hold the right to make binding political decisions. The keystone of direct democracy, in short, is the decisiveness of results of direct democratic decision-making processes. Citizens do not delegate power to make political decisions to elected representatives; instead they keep this prerogative in their own hands. Even when elected representatives are entrusted with public duties, citizens remain in ultimate control. The responsiveness of public officials is secured because they know that their decisions are subject to public approval and that they risk a possible rebuke in a subsequent referendum should they disregard public opinion. Direct democracy, therefore, can be seen as an extreme form of government by the people (Kübler & Ladner 2003: 142 ff.). There are various ways of implementing the idea of direct democracy. Two principal alternatives can be distinguished. One option is to introduce procedures of direct democratic participation.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.