Show Less

Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World

Evidence from Eleven Countries

Edited by Giuliano Bonoli and Toshimitsu Shinkawa

This book comprehensively documents developments in pension policy in eleven advanced industrial countries in Western Europe, East Asia and North America. In order to explore what population ageing means for the sustainability of pension systems, the authors present a detailed review of pension policy making over the past two decades and provide up-to-date analysis of current pension legislation. They examine the factors that can facilitate or impede the adaptation of pension systems and the features that shape and determine reforms. They also highlight the fact that although the path of reform taken by each country is somewhat different, the processes at work are often very similar.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The Politics of Pension Reform in Japan: Institutional Legacies, Credit-claiming and Blame Avoidance

Toshimitsu Shinkawa


Toshimitsu Shinkawa INTRODUCTION As suggested in the introductory chapter, Japan can be classified as a member of the Bismarckian Lite category of pension systems, together with Canada and the United States. Contrary to these two countries, however, Japan faces a serious challenge to pension sustainability. What is responsible for such a contrast between Japan and the other two countries? The generosity of Japan’s public pensions as compared with the other two countries contributes partially to its fiscal tightness, but cannot explain the degree and extent of its crisis, since the earnings replacement ratio of public pension in Japan is substantially lower than in social insurance countries.1 It is true that Japan is ageing much more rapidly and will be one of the most aged societies in the world within the next two decades, but it should be remembered that pension retrenchment started in Japan as early as the 1980s, when its ageing ratio (the ratio of aged 65 and over to the whole population) was relatively low (9.1 per cent in 1980 and 12 per cent 1990). Pension reform is brought to the political agenda in Japan almost every five years in mandatory actuarial revaluation. Before 1985, pension reform meant the expansion of pensions, or raising the benefit level with minimum increases in contributions. In the 1985 reform, however, the government reversed the trend by tightening the relationship between benefits and contributions. Most noteworthy is that reducing the benefit level was authorized for the first time in Japanese pension history.2...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.