Show Less

Ageing and Pension Reform Around the World

Evidence from Eleven Countries

Edited by Giuliano Bonoli and Toshimitsu Shinkawa

This book comprehensively documents developments in pension policy in eleven advanced industrial countries in Western Europe, East Asia and North America. In order to explore what population ageing means for the sustainability of pension systems, the authors present a detailed review of pension policy making over the past two decades and provide up-to-date analysis of current pension legislation. They examine the factors that can facilitate or impede the adaptation of pension systems and the features that shape and determine reforms. They also highlight the fact that although the path of reform taken by each country is somewhat different, the processes at work are often very similar.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Pension Reform in Korea: Conflict between Social Solidarity and Long-term Financial Sustainability

Yeon Myung Kim and Kyo-seong Kim


Yeon Myung Kim and Kyo-seong Kim INTRODUCTION There are four major public pension schemes in Korea; these are the Government Employees Pension Scheme, the Military Personnel Pension Scheme, the Private School Teachers Pension Scheme and the National Pension Scheme (hereafter NPS), of which the NPS is the largest in terms of the number of participants and accumulated funds. The history of the NPS goes back nearly 30 years to 1973 when the Park Chung-hee government (1962–79) enacted the National Welfare Pension Act (NWP). However, implementation of the NWP was delayed until 1988, mainly because of economic reasons such as the first oil shock and the ensuing worldwide recession. As the Korean economy rebounded and in the wake of the radicalization of distributional conflicts fuelled by democratic movements in the mid-1980s, the autocratic administration of President Chun Doo-hwan (1980–87) declared the implementation of the NWP in 1986. The government revised the original NWP on a more conservative basis and initiated a mandatory retirement scheme known as NPS in 1988 (National Pension Corporation, 1998a, pp. 121–123; Yang, 2000, pp. 106–115). The Korean NPS started from the beginning as an integrated occupational model covering all major groups such as white- and blue-collar workers, farmers, fishing people and the self-employed under a single umbrella. It was because there was no social basis to build up some cooperative or voluntary pension schemes by companies, labour unions or friendly societies, as the social fabric for cooperatives and the labour union movement all...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.