Show Less

Public Policy and the New European Agendas

Edited by Fergus Carr and Andrew Massey

This broad and all-encompassing study focuses on Europe’s new policy agendas. It brings together international academic experts on a range of policies to discuss Europe’s place in the world and its relationship to the USA and beyond. This book concentrates on two key themes of particular salience for policy makers: the enlargement of the EU and the place of Europe in international politics. An expansive list of important policy areas within these themes is explored.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: International Terrorism and EU Immigration, Asylum and Borders Policy: The Unexpected Victims of 11 September 2001

Elspeth Guild


Elspeth Guild INTRODUCTION What is the relationship between forced migration and terrorism in the European Union after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001? I will argue here that there is no direct relationship between forced migrants coming to Europe and the risk of terrorism in the EU. In so far as a relationship exists, it is indirect, the result of a displacement of linkages made at the political level about security and borders. Forced migration is only one form of border crossing, but it is the one which engages international human rights commitments directly. Forced migrants are normally classified by EU member states as asylum seekers and refugees.1 In none of the 11 September and subsequent terrorist-related attacks have asylum seekers been directly or indeed indirectly implicated.2 Movement by persons across borders has, however, been central to the 11 September 2001 US terrorist attacks in the form of foreign students, tourists and possibly irregular migrants.3 The first EU Justice and Home Affairs Council meeting following the US attacks took place on 20 September 2001 with an agenda exclusively devoted to the EU response on security and other measures to combat terrorism.4 Four types of measures were adopted: first measures on judicial cooperation,5 cooperation between police and intelligence services, cooperation with the USA, and measures at the border. Specifically the JHA Council agreed to strengthen the controls at the external borders of the EU; increase surveillance measures under Article 2(3) Schengen Implementing Agreement 1990,6 reinforce...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.