Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility
Show Less

Research Handbook on Corporate Legal Responsibility

Edited by Stephen Tully

The ever-important topic of corporate legal responsibility is deconstructed into many multifaceted components in this fascinating Handbook, which systematically examines each in turn and describes the contemporary legal position.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: Reforming the Doctrine of Attribution: A Canadian Solution to British Concerns?

Darcy L. MacPherson


Darcy L. MacPherson1 Introduction Public scandal and tragedy have often served as the backdrop for law reform. Nowhere is this more evident than in the law governing corporations. It is virtually certain that media scrutiny of the inner workings of Enron and others contributed to the adoption of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 20022 in the United States. Some commentators have even suggested that a fundamental reassertion of governmental authority over corporations is needed (Bakan, 2004: Ch. 6). Similarly, media coverage of tragedies in both Canada and the United Kingdom has led to calls for reform with respect to how corporations are held criminally liable for the actions of individuals acting on their behalf. This chapter begins by examining the historical roots of corporate criminal liability. The subsequent two sections review the current state of the law in each of the United Kingdom and Canada. Although the two nations have much in common, they also diverge on certain key points in this area. Attention will then turn to reforms enacted by the Canadian government in response to corporate scandal. We shall examine whether such a change would be appropriate for the United Kingdom. The chapter concludes that while the reforms are a positive development, they are not without flaws, and should therefore be viewed with caution. History The amenability of corporations to the criminal law has been in a state of evolution for some time. Early in the twentieth century, the English courts were generally unwilling to hold corporations liable...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.