EU Consumer Law and Policy
Show Less

EU Consumer Law and Policy

Stephen Weatherill

In many respects the consumer is supposed to be the ultimate beneficiary of the process of market integration in Europe, but the EC Treaty has never included an elaborate recognition of how the EU serves the consumer interest. This highly esteemed book, now in a brand new edition, provides a comprehensive and up-to-date introduction to the subject, explaining the evolution of consumer law and policy in the EC in terms of both legislative and judicial activity.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 4: Market Transparency and Consumer Protection

Stephen Weatherill


CHOICE OF REGULATORY TECHNIQUE Requiring that the consumer be provided with specified information about a contemplated transaction is a regulatory technique that has enjoyed considerable popularity in the development of EC measures affecting protection of consumers’ economic interests.1 This approach to improving transparency in the pre-contractual phase has frequently been combined with protection in the post-contractual phase, most strikingly through the prescription of a ‘coolingoff’ period within which the consumer is entitled to exercise a right to withdraw from an agreed deal. These techniques do not address directly the content of the bargain between trader and consumer. Contractual terms remain to be fixed by private negotiation. The assumption underlying the type of regulatory technique examined in this chapter is that an imbalance in economic power can be sufficiently corrected by adjusting the environment within which the bargain is struck by giving the consumer extra information in advance and extra time to consider the implications. There is much to be said for these techniques as forms of regulation which minimize interference with private autonomy. Viewed in their most favourable light, they yield a more efficient market by promoting negotiation and informed consumer choice, without substituting public decision-making about the contents of contracts for private choice. More intrusive controls, such as a ban on particular types of contract, may unduly diminish consumer choice. To assert a power directly to check the validity of particular terms may distort the market, for example by dissuading traders from offering a wide choice. The aspiration to...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.