Handbook of Fiscal Federalism
Show Less

Handbook of Fiscal Federalism

Edited by Ehtisham Ahmad and Giorgio Brosio

This major Handbook addresses fiscal relations between different levels of government under the general rubric of ‘fiscal federalism’, providing a review of the latest literature as well as an invaluable guide for practitioners and policy makers seeking informed policy options. The contributors include leading lights in the field, many of whom have themselves made seminal contributions to the literature.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 20: Fiscal Federalism and National Unity

Richard M. Bird and Robert D. Ebel


Richard M. Bird and Robert D. Ebel Introduction Belgium, Bosnia–Herzegovina, Canada, the People’s Republic of China, Germany, India, Indonesia, Iraq, the Philippines, Russia, Spain, Sudan, Switzerland – what can this diverse set of countries possibly have in common? One important answer is that each contains within its boundaries a significant territorially-based group of people who are, or who consider themselves to be, distinct and different in ethnicity, in language, in religion, or just in history (ancient or recent) from the majority of the population. Indeed, contrary to the common view – one might say mythology – that the most ‘natural’ nation state is a unified and homogeneous entity, such ‘fragmented’ countries (Bird and Stauffer 2001)1 – are found throughout the world. Homogeneous nations are more the exception than the rule. Indeed, heterogeneity, whether ethnic or economic, is a more common feature of most countries than homogeneity.2 A second important characteristic of many countries is that they exhibit, to greater or lesser degrees, some ‘asymmetry’ in the way in which different regions are treated by their intergovernmental fiscal systems. While such asymmetry is often most obvious in formal federal countries, it comes up, sometimes in surprising ways, in almost every instance. This chapter explores the varied extent and manner in which asymmetrical treatment helps (or hinders) the maintenance of an effective nation state. ‘Effectiveness’ in this context may be understood in two ways. The first relates to the normal focus of economic analysis of public sector activities: how effectively, efficiently, and (perhaps) equitably...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.