Fiscal Policy in Economic and Monetary Union
Show Less

Fiscal Policy in Economic and Monetary Union

Theory, Evidence and Institutions

Marco Buti and Daniele Franco

This book explores the origins, rationale, problems and prospects of the European fiscal policy framework. It provides the reader with a roadmap to EMU’s budgetary framework by exploring its theoretical and empirical foundations, uncovering its historical roots and emphasising its supranational nature.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 13: Postscript: A New Stability and Growth Pact?

Marco Buti and Daniele Franco


The Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) has been the most contentious element of EMU. There have been proposals to reform it ever since it was adopted by the Amsterdam European Council in June 1997. The debate accelerated in 2002 under the pressure of unfavourable budgetary developments in some euro-area countries. The insufficient fiscal consolidation of the previous years and the cyclical downturn pushed the deficits of several countries towards or above 3 per cent of GDP. In November 2002 the Commission issued a Communication on ‘Strengthening the co-ordination of budgetary policies’ which outlined some possible changes in interpretation, mostly focused on the issue of the medium-term budgetary targets. The ECOFIN Council decided to leave the rules unchanged while mentioning the need to put more emphasis on sustainability and the pace of debt reduction and stressing the need to avoid pro-cyclical policies, especially when growth conditions are favourable. The debate illustrated just how difficult it would be to reach agreement on any significant reform of the Pact. The pace of events quickened in November 2003 when the ECOFIN Council decided not to follow the European Commission’s recommendations to apply the excessive deficit procedure to France and Germany. However, the fact that several Member States supported the Commission threw the differences between the European institutions into sharp relief. The Commission took the case to the European Court of Justice which, in July 2004, annulled the ECOFIN Council conclusions. It also ruled, however, that the Council was...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.