Amenities and Rural Development
Show Less

Amenities and Rural Development

Theory, Methods and Public Policy

Edited by Gary Paul Green, Steven C. Deller and David D. Marcouiller

Amenities and Rural Development explores the paradigmatic shift in how we view land resources and the potential for development in amenity-rich rural regions. Amenity-based growth can lead to several paths, based largely on proximity to urban areas and the type of development that occurs, whether it be seasonal residents, retirees, or tourism. The distributional implications of amenity-led development are an important consideration for policy, both within and between communities and regions. The contributors conclude that public policy needs to focus on maximizing complementary and supplementary uses while minimizing antagonistic uses of amenities.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Regional Economic Growth with a Focus on Amenities

Steven C. Deller, David W. Marcouiller and Donald B.K. English


Steven C. Deller, David W. Marcouiller, Donald B.K. English and Victor Lledo INTRODUCTION Natural amenities such as lakes, forests and mountainous areas along with built amenities that add value to those natural amenities, such as marinas, are becoming more important in explaining rural growth patterns (Deller et al. 2001; Fulton et al. 1997; Green 2001; Isserman 2000; Marcouiller et al. 2002; McGranahan 1999; OECD 1994; 1996; 1999; Power 1988). Both descriptive analysis (Beale and Johnson 1998; Johnson and Stewart (Chapter 11, this volume); McGranahan 1999; Nord and Cromartie 1997) and more advanced statistical modeling approaches (Deller et al. 2001; Goe and Green (Chapter 7, this volume); Rudzitis 1999) have found that rural areas that are endowed with amenities such as scenic beauty, wildlife and recreational and tourism attributes experience higher rates of growth than the US average. Among the first to suggest that the presence of wilderness and large expanses of open space were an important reason why people moved to or lived in remote rural counties were Rudzitis and Johansen (1991). Not all studies support the notion that natural amenities have strong effects on economic growth. Keith and Fawson (1995) examined the effects of wilderness on local economic characteristics in Utah and found little statistical evidence supporting the central hypothesis. Duffy-Deno (1997) analysed the local economic impact of state parks in the eight intermountain Western states and found a relatively weak effect on population and employment growth. In a related study Duffy-Deno (1998) also...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.