Aid, Institutions and Development
Show Less

Aid, Institutions and Development

New Approaches to Growth, Governance and Poverty

Ashok Chakravarti

In spite of massive flows over the past 50 years, aid has failed to have any significant impact on development. Marginalization from the world economy and increases in absolute poverty are causing countries to degenerate into failed, oppressive and, in some cases, dangerous states. To address this malaise, Ashok Chakravarti argues that there should be more recognition of the role economic and political governance can play in achieving positive and sustainable development outcomes.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: The Way Ahead

Ashok Chakravarti


The foregoing analysis has shown that aid has had a weak impact on key macro-economic, institutional and governance-related variables. It has not been an effective instrument for bringing about economic and social change in the developing world, and, to a large extent, has been a waste of scarce resources. Aid has been channelled to developing countries primarily through their respective governments who have predominantly used these resources to finance consumption or unproductive public investment. There are a few success stories. However, these belong to the small group of countries that have maintained a relatively non-distorted environment, and pursued a combination of orthodox policies at the macro-level with selective government interventions at a micro- or industry-level. Our study finds that certain factors are critical for high rates of growth and sustainable development to be achieved. These factors can be termed the preconditions for successful economic development. This conclusion is not only consistent with the historical experience of the East Asian countries, but with explanations of the differential growth performance of developing-country regions during the past 25 years or so. The fact that the growth convergence hypothesis seems to be valid for Asia but not for Africa shows that, apart from investment levels, take-off requires that the other preconditions are met (Ito, 1997). Take-off, therefore, is not merely a question of raising investment levels through domestic or foreign savings, as was postulated by development theorists in the early post-war period. The literature reviewed in this study provides a good indication of the...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.