Digital Broadcasting
Show Less

Digital Broadcasting

Policy and Practice in the Americas, Europe and Japan

Edited by Martin Cave and Kiyoshi Nakamura

Digital television is transforming both broadcasting and, as a result of convergence, the larger world of communications. The impending analogue switch-off will have a major impact on households all over the developed world. Digital Broadcasting considers the effects of digital television on the availability, price and nature of broadcast services in the Americas, Europe and Japan. It shows how this depends upon what platforms – cable, satellite, fixed or wireless broadband – countries have available for use and also upon government policies and regulatory interventions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 10: Copy Control of Digital Broadcasting Content: An Economic Perspective

Koji Domon and Eulmoon Joo

Extract

10. Copy control of digital broadcasting content: an economic perspective Koji Domon and Eulmoon Joo INTRODUCTION While music, photography, and home-videos have been digitalized, the remaining phase of media digitalization is broadcasting. Even though the Internet and media digitalization have developed concurrently, we cannot discuss broadcasting digitalization without accounting for the influence of the Internet. One such issue, the concern of content suppliers, is copyright infringement by Peer-to-Peer (P2P) systems. Broadcasters have seen music labels damaged by such infringements, and have managed to protect their content from it. To prevent content from outflowing into P2P networks, they have introduced copy control of digital broadcasting content, so-called ‘Copy Once’ in Japan and ‘Broadcast Flag’ in the US. In this chapter, we shall consider, from an economic perspective, the copy control of digital broadcasting content and the resultant restrictions on personal use. In general, judgment of a copyright infringement is complicated. The concept of a copyright has a long history.1 A basic mistake we sometimes make is treating copyrighted content as physical goods such as a pencil. Intellectual property2 for the social welfare, including broadcasting content, has been treated differently from physical goods. Copying for personal use complicates this copyright issue. While photocopying and home video-recording make copying content free, content producers considered this copyright infringement at the time when such copy technologies had emerged. Legal judgment on this problem was that personal use of personally copied content was permissible with the US courts coining ‘fair use’ in dealing...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.