Culture and Welfare State
Show Less

Culture and Welfare State

Values and Social Policy in Comparative Perspective

Edited by Wim van Oorschot, Michael Opiekla and Birgit Pfau-Effinger

Culture and Welfare State provides comparative studies on the interplay between cultural factors and welfare policies. Starting with an analysis of the historical and cultural foundations of Western European welfare states, reflected in the competing ideologies of liberalism, conservatism and socialism, the book goes on to compare the Western European welfare model to those in North America, Asia and Central and Eastern Europe. Comprehensive and engaging, this volume examines not only the relationships between cultural change and welfare restructuring, taking empirical evidence from policy reforms in contemporary Europe, but also the popular legitimacy of welfare, focusing particularly on the underlying values, beliefs and attitudes of people in European countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Welfare Policy Reforms in Japan and Korea: Cultural and Institutional Factors

Ito Peng


Ito Peng Scholars engaged in comparative welfare state research on East Asian countries face two critical problems. First, the mainstream understanding of East Asian welfare states often takes superficial notion of East Asian culture as a theoretical platform from which to examine these welfare regimes. Indeed, frequently notions such as Confucian values have been used to explain what are often thought as the unique characteristics of East Asian welfare systems – a strong sense of work ethics, emphasis on education and self-discipline, filial piety, gender role division, and respect for the elders and authority (Jones, 1990, 1993; Sung, 2003).1 Although there is no denying that certain features of East Asian welfare systems, such as the lack of state provisions for the family and personal social services, and policy emphasis on the elderly rather than children, do appear to cohere with some tenets of Confucian principles, these features are, on a closer examination, by no means unique to East Asia, nor is there clear evidence of causal relationship between Confucian values and policy outcomes.2 The second problem associated with comparative welfare state studies of East Asia, and particularly for those who are interested in examining the impacts of culture on welfare states, is that the current understanding of culture is too unclear and amorphous. As a result, even though many scholars do recognize the influence of culture on political processes and policy preferences (Lipset, 1990), many eschew overt cultural explanation. In this chapter, I define welfare state culture...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.