Improving Energy Efficiency through Technology
Show Less

Improving Energy Efficiency through Technology

Trends, Investment Behaviour and Policy Design

Edited by Raymond J.G.M. Florax, Henri L.F. de Groot and Peter Mulder

This innovative book explores the adoption of energy-saving technologies and their impact on energy efficiency improvements. It contains a mix of theoretical and empirical contributions, and combines and compares economic and physical indicators to monitor and analyse trends in energy efficiency.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Energy Investment Behaviour: Firm Heterogeneity and Subsidy Design

Daan P. van Soest and Herman R.J. Vollebergh


Daan P. van Soest and Herman R.J. Vollebergh INTRODUCTION 1 Over the past three decades, much attention has been paid to the potential of public policies to reduce the emission of polluting substances that give rise to environmental problems, such as global warming and acid rain. A wide range of policy instruments is available, ranging from pollution taxes, tradable emission permits, abatement subsidies, quotas and performance standards, to covenants. The main criterion by which the economic profession has evaluated the instruments is that of static efficiency; that is, the extent to which these instruments can achieve a specified environmental objective at minimum cost. A necessary condition for static efficiency is that marginal abatement costs are equalized across firms, and in this respect instruments like emission taxes or tradable emission permits are generally preferred to quotas, performance standards and investment subsidies (Baumol and Oates, 1988). However, static efficiency is just one of many criteria on which to base instrument choice, and it is not necessarily the most important one (Jaffe and Stavins, 1995; Jaffe et al., 2003). With ongoing economic growth and the associated pressure on the natural regenerative capacity of the environment, ever more efficient technologies should be developed and adopted to ensure that environmental protection and economic growth are not incompatible in the long run. These technologies should be able to produce the same amount of output with less pollution, or to abate pollution at lower marginal cost. Indeed, Kneese and Schulze (1975, p. 38) already argued that ‘over...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.