- Elgar original reference
Edited by Diana Bilimoria and Sandy Kristin Piderit
Chapter 9: Balance, Integration and Harmonization: Selected Metaphors for Managing the Parts and the Whole of Living
9 Balance, integration and harmonization: selected metaphors for managing the parts and the whole of living Sandy Kristin Piderit The study of work–life issues is several decades old, and has evolved signiﬁcantly. In this chapter, I comment on two dominant metaphors which have been used to frame such scholarship. While a plethora of other conceptual labels are sometimes invoked in the field, including conﬂict, enhancement, interaction, juggling, reconciliation and spillover, two metaphorical terms have been dominant. Lambert and Kossek (2005) point out that scholars ‘have tended to adopt the most commonly used terms’ (p. 518) which they identify as work–family balance and work–life integration. These are the ﬁrst two metaphors I consider in this chapter. Next, I draw out the potential merits of a third metaphor recently advanced by Rapoport, Lewis and Gambles (2005). When I ﬁrst began to explore the work–life literature, I was puzzled by the coexistence of the two conceptual labels, balance and integration. At ﬁrst, I tried to make sense of the two labels, which seemed inconsistent with one another, by testing the assumption that ‘balance’ was a label used in writing for practitioners, and ‘integration’ was reserved for more theoretically grounded writing for scholars. However, I soon found that there are valuable and informative practitioner articles using the ‘integration’ label (for example, Shellenbarger, 1999) and carefully crafted scholarly articles using the ‘balance’ label (for example, Caproni, 2004; Kofodimos, 2004). I realized that my starting assumption could not withstand testing....
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.