Innovation, Agglomeration and Regional Competition
Show Less

Innovation, Agglomeration and Regional Competition

Edited by Charlie Karlsson, Börje Johansson and Roger R. Stough

This book provides a state-of-the-art overview of current research on regional competition and co-operation. Developing our current understanding of the new role of regions and their behaviour, this book addresses questions such as: How and why do regions compete? How does competition between border regions operate? Which regions are successful and which regions fail? What are the implications of regional competition in terms of resource allocation, the location of economic activities and the distribution of incomes? The book illuminates a number of critical theoretical end empirical issues relating to the competitive and cooperative nature of regions, as well as highlighting a number of new case studies from a variety of countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 9: Is Competition Between Regions Welfare-Increasing?

Gerhard C. Geerdink and Peter J. Stauvermann


1 Gerhard C. Geerdink and Peter J. Stauvermann INTRODUCTION 9.1 Over the past 30 years, state and local governments have assumed a greater responsibility for economic development. All kind of incentives, such as tax breaks, low-cost or free land, the issuance of tax-exempt bonds, training funds, the construction of roads, and other infrastructure investments, are used to attract all kinds of firms. The main purpose is to boost regional economic activity in order to meet local economic and political objectives, for example reducing unemployment, increasing the tax revenue, creating the regional image of a high-tech area, knowledge business center, and so on. In order to meet these targets, big investments are made by local governments. Also huge amounts of subsidy are offered to firms and businesses who settle in the region. Local governments and the subsidized companies usually extol the benefits of these deals, while critics complain that they are a waste of public money. It is difficult to evaluate the competing claims of these policies. The traditional approach to evaluating policies designed to attract new plants is to calculate the number of jobs gained and the cost of the tax breaks and so on awarded to firms. Below are some striking examples. It is widely cited that DaimlerChrysler (former name: Daimler-Benz) received a $250 million ($165 000 per job) incentive package for locating in Vance, Alabama (USA); the Toyota plant in Georgetown, Kentucky (USA) was awarded $200 million ($80 000 per job); Boeing was given $50 million ($100 000...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.