Innovation, Agglomeration and Regional Competition
Show Less

Innovation, Agglomeration and Regional Competition

Edited by Charlie Karlsson, Börje Johansson and Roger R. Stough

This book provides a state-of-the-art overview of current research on regional competition and co-operation. Developing our current understanding of the new role of regions and their behaviour, this book addresses questions such as: How and why do regions compete? How does competition between border regions operate? Which regions are successful and which regions fail? What are the implications of regional competition in terms of resource allocation, the location of economic activities and the distribution of incomes? The book illuminates a number of critical theoretical end empirical issues relating to the competitive and cooperative nature of regions, as well as highlighting a number of new case studies from a variety of countries.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Accessibility to R & D and Patent Production

Urban Gråsjö


10. Accessibility to R&D and patent production Urban Gråsjö INTRODUCTION 10.1 The five largest municipalities in Sweden accounting for 20 per cent of Sweden’s population also account for 44 per cent of Sweden’s patent applications. Can this be explained by the high concentration of university and company R&D to these municipalities, or is it because of other factors? In order to get satisfactory explanations of questions like this, the chapter starts with a discussion of the importance of proximity for knowledge flows and innovation systems. Knowledge flows is a concept that covers different types of flows where knowledge is involved. In Johansson (2004) knowledge flows are divided into two main groups: (i) Transaction-based flows, that is the parties involved agree on a transaction of knowledge; (ii) Knowledge spillovers, that is knowledge is an unintended side-effect of ordinary activities. Knowledge spillovers can in turn be mediated by market mechanisms or they can be a pure externality. A pure externality in this context is for example when companies observe and copy techniques from each other. Some models of knowledge diffusion assume that geography plays no role in the cost of adoption (Spence, 1984; Cohen and Levinthal, 1990). Other models based on theories of localization suggest that just because knowledge spills over does not mean that it transmits without costs across geographic space. In particular, these theories argue that geographic proximity reduces the cost of accessing and absorbing knowledge spillovers. Fundamental to the theories of localized spillovers is the distinction...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.