Criminalization of Competition Law Enforcement Economic and Legal Implications for the EU Member States
Economic and Legal Implications for the EU Member States
Edited by Katalin J. Cseres, Maarten Pieter Schinkel and Floris O.W. Vogelaar
Chapter 10: The Negative Interplay between National Custodial Sanctions and Leniency
10. The negative interplay between national custodial sanctions and leniency Michael J. Frese 1 INTRODUCTION By institutionalizing its policy to grant lenient treatment1 and its method of setting ﬁnes,2 the European Commission has considerably curtailed its discretionary powers – delegated by Regulation 1/20033 – to sanction infringements of Article 81 EC. Moreover, it has given undertakings the possibility to calculate the costs of collusion and the beneﬁts of applying for leniency when the Commission enforces against a cartel. If the costs of possibly being ﬁned are sufﬁciently high and transparent, and the beneﬁts of leniency are considerable and certain, early whistleblowing will be stimulated.4 The Commission’s leniency policy has already proven to be an effective tool for the destabilization of cartels.5 However, in the Community’s current decentralized enforcement system, cartels will be increasingly pursued by National Competition Authorities (‘NCAs’) pursuant to national procedures, which may differ greatly. As different sanctioning procedures imply different leniency policies, several national leniency schemes are operative parallel to the Commission’s Leniency Notice.6 It is questionable whether these diverging sanctioning procedures can effectively contribute to the destabilization of cartels. When the Commission does not enforce against a cartel, for example, due to lack of competence or prioritization,7 colluding undertakings could be prosecuted and sanctioned by NCAs under their respective national sanctioning schemes.8 Collaborating undertakings will then be ‘forced’ to ﬁle multiple leniency applications. Multiple leniency schemes consist of different, possibly conflicting criteria that will inevitably hamper transparency and certainty and therefore might endanger...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.