Edited by Amelie F. Constant and Klaus F. Zimmermann
We review empirical analyses of migration decisions, using life-cycle models to interpret migration histories. The starting points are Schultz (1961), who considered migration as a form of investment in human capital, and Da Vanzo (1983), who documented the richness of individual migration histories, pointing out that although most individuals never move, those who do are likely to move again, often returning to a home location.1This means that migration decisions should be viewed as a sequence of location choices, where the individual knows there will be opportunities to modify or reverse moves that do not work out well. Sjaastad’s (1962) treatment of migration as an investment emphasizes the dynamic aspect of migration _ expected costs and payoffs to migration change over time. Viewed within a life-cycle perspective, individuals (or families) decide whether and when to move. Allowing households to make multiple migration decisions substantially increases the model’s complexity. Decisions made in previous periods (for example, savings, education, marriage and fertility) determine choices available in the current period, and expectations of future events also influence current decisions.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.
Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.
Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.
Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.