A Post-Keynesian Perspective
Chapter 1: Keynes-Inspired Macroeconomic Theory in a Methodological Perspective
INTRODUCTION This chapter will explain why the group of ‘Keynesian’ economists cannot be perceived as belonging to one homogeneous school of thought. As already indicated in Figure 0.1 which illustrates ‘the macroeconomic family tree’, there are a number of theoretical schools that employ the description ‘Keynesian’, regardless of the fact that they are located at opposite sides of the methodological chasm. This is confusing, to put it mildly, and this chapter will attempt to redress the issue. The reasons for this convergence of designation can be found in the sphere of political aspiration, since a common result from old-Keynesians, new-Keynesians and post-Keynesians is that macroeconomic policy can exert significant influence on economic development. That is something that the three schools of theory have in common with Keynes. In the 1930s, he developed his macroeconomic theory as a reaction to the prevailing (macro) economic orthodoxy that recommended a laissez-faire policy combined with a strengthening of market forces as means of curing unemployment. Keynes’s General Theory contained some theoretical arguments as to why even within a well-functioning and competitive market economy full employment is a special case, so that economic policy can contribute to keeping macroeconomic development on the track of full employment. Post-Keynesian theory is a direct continuation of Keynes’s macroeconomic tradition, understood as theory and method, which was initiated in 1936. It maintains the requirement for an active economic policy derived from analyses within the framework of an open macroeconomic landscape. We will return to these methodological issues in the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.