Macroeconomic Methodology
Show Less

Macroeconomic Methodology

A Post-Keynesian Perspective

Jesper Jespersen

Jesper Jespersen presents a treatise on the importance of the choice of methodology within macroeconomics. Given that no scientifically based macroeconomic policy recommendation should be established without an evaluation of the methods employed, this book gives a clear exposition of how proper macroeconomic analysis should be undertaken. Furthermore, it is convincingly argued that one of the lasting contributions of John Maynard Keynes was his emphasis on methodology; that macroeconomic consequences of uncertainty could not be analysed within the established general equilibrium framework. It is due to post-Keynesian economics supported by critical realism that the understanding of Keynes’s methodology has been resurrected, which has eventually resulted in renewed debate on realistic macroeconomic policies to restore full employment without inflation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: The Fallacy of Composition

Jesper Jespersen


The fallacy of composition occurs when one incorrectly attempts to generalize from a relationship that is true for each individual, but is not true for the whole. (Oswego, 2006: 3) INTRODUCTION: FROM MICRO TO MACRO IN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE1 It is the ambition of the neoclassical schools that the methodological point of departure should be methodological individualism. This is based on the assumption that the stable building blocks for the economic system are the individual preference structures that are assumed to be independent of the economic environment. The individual has integrity in relation to his or her own economic dispositions. Rational choices are made with the goal of optimizing the individual utility based on existing knowledge. With this methodological point of departure, the aim of neoclassical macroeconomics is to develop a theory that can detect important phenomena for the aggregated economy. Since individual behaviour is assumed to be the stable primary element, the neoclassical methodological demand is for macroeconomic models to have an explicit and consistent microeconomic foundation (see for example Andersen, 2000). This demand for an explicit microeconomic foundation was formulated after the failed attempts to explain the economic development throughout the 1970s with the large, so-called Keynesian, macro-econometric models (Harcourt, 1977). This model tradition was internationally represented by, among others, Franco Modigliani and Lawrence Klein. In Denmark, this empirical and ‘Keynesian’ model tradition was from the early 1970s represented by the model in the Ministry of Finance (ADAM) and the model in the Danish Economic Council (SMEC) respectively...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.