Globalisation, Citizenship and the War on Terror
Show Less

Globalisation, Citizenship and the War on Terror

Edited by Maurice Mullard and Bankole A. Cole

This book explores globalisation and the war on terror in a world that is becoming increasingly and significantly polarised and in which dialogue is undermined. The authors contend that citizenship does not obey a static definition, and that its meaning is located in changing economic, social and political contexts. Equally, civil, political and social rights are continually being politically defined. The war on terror has, the book argues, influenced issues of civil liberties and prioritised the need for ‘security’ over and above the protection of human rights: it has redefined the meaning of the rule of law.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Discourse Analysis and the War on Terror

Michael S. Drake


Michael S. Drake INTRODUCTION This chapter assesses how the study of discourse can illuminate the dynamics of the war on terror. It commences with an overview of approaches to the study of discourse which identifies problems for discourse analysis that are then traced through a wider range of critical approaches to the discourse of the war on terror. Since the concept of discourse itself remains contested or at least open (there is little even contentious dialogue between differing approaches), such an overview needs to begin with discussion of the ‘discourse of discourse’, or how approaches to the analysis of discourse construct their subject. Such attempts at overview conventionally begin by tracing the development of discourse studies to sources in structural linguistics and the work of Michel Foucault, but in so doing they partake of one of the principal shortcomings of discourse studies itself, which is to take a primarily textualist approach, despite theoretically extending the concept of discourse to social practice in some way or other. APPROACHES TO THE ANALYSIS OF DISCOURSE AND SOCIETY The analysis of discourse has proliferated over the past twenty years, penetrating into fields of social science that were previously dominated by empirical and even positivistic enquiry, and opening hitherto apparently peripheral phenomena as valid and significant data for analysis. It is of course contentious whether this is in fact ‘new’ at all, since most formulations of discourse analysis could include such classical work in social science as Karl Marx’s critical analysis of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.