The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to Transaction Cost Economics

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Peter G. Klein and Michael E. Sykuta

Since its emergence in the 1970s, transaction cost economics (TCE) has become a leading approach in the research on contracts, firm organization and strategy, antitrust, marketing, inter-firm collaboration and entrepreneurship. With contributions by leading scholars in economics, law and business administration – including Oliver E. Williamson, recipient of the 2009 Nobel Prize in economics for his development of the transaction cost approach – this volume reviews the latest developments in TCE and applies them to contemporary theoretical and empirical problems.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 26: Subjectivism, Understanding, and Transaction Costs

Fu-Lai Tony Yu

Extract

26 Subjectivism, understanding, and transaction costs Fu-Lai Tony Yu Since Ronald Coase’s ‘The Nature of the Firm’ (1937), the concept of transaction costs has been applied to a wide range of economic and management issues. The transaction cost paradigm, though widely accepted and increasingly integrated into the mainstream neoclassical analysis, does not lack criticisms. A major drawback of the transaction cost paradigm is that the role of the entrepreneur is missing. Foss and Klein (2008, p. 428) rightly point out that: modern theories of the firm portray decision situations as always unambiguous and ‘given’. The choice of efficient economic organization is portrayed as a standard maximization problem . . . There is no learning, no need for entrepreneurial creation or discovery, and explicit room for the emergence of new contractual or organizational forms . . . [T]he strategy spaces are fully specified ex ante. The transaction cost theory of institutional change, as presented by Washington School economists including Steven Cheung, Douglass North, and Yoram Barzel, has also been charged with circular reasoning. Sven-Erik Sjöstrand (1995, p. 34) notes: in this paradigm, the institutional setting represents the individuals’ incentive to act. At the same time, the institutions provide the standards for eliminating ‘failing’ attempts. We then ask what explains the possible motive for an individual to do something new, something that is not part of the incentives built into the existing institutions. To put differently, how is it possible to develop new paths and institutions, when institutions themselves (as constraints) define both incentives and outcomes...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.