Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship
Show Less

Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship

Edited by Andreas Georg Scherer and Guido Palazzo

The Handbook of Research on Global Corporate Citizenship identifies and fosters key interdisciplinary research on corporate citizenship and provides a framework for further academic debate on corporate responsibility in a global society.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 22: Transparency, Integrity and Openness: The Nike Example

Frits Schipper and David M. Bojé


Frits Schipper and David M. Bojé Introduction Nowadays, ‘corporate citizenship’ and ‘corporate social responsibility’ are key expressions in matters of corporate governance. Sometimes they are supposed to denote something different. For example, ‘corporate citizenship’ as referring to a company’s local context, to a ‘civil society’ to which companies are also supposed to contribute, going beyond their own direct business activities (sponsoring, societal aid and so on). If so, then ‘corporate social responsibility’ refers more to business-related issues (for example, human capital, environment, stakeholders, sustainability), even on a global scale. However, sometimes this distinction is not made, and both expressions are used almost synonymously. This is understandable, especially when companies have worldwide operations and act in the ‘global society’ (Zadek 2007, p. 41). Different languages are used in discussing and evaluating matters of governance. Some of them refer to the company as an actor, others to it being an instrument. Among the first are, for example, ‘moral subject’, ‘personhood’, ‘citizen’ and ‘homo economicus’; among the second are ‘shareholder value’, ‘brand’ and ‘money making’. Of course, we should not make a dichotomy of this, because a brand can be an important aspect of a company’s identity, co-constituting its actorship and giving content to corporate governance. Governance always has a general as well as a particular side. Constraints, standards and duties, sometimes set by law, make up a general structure with which companies will have to comply.1 This leaves room for individual differences, related to actorship, which is emphasized by...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.