The Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies
Show Less

The Evaluation of Active Labour Market Policies

Measures, Public Private Partnerships and Benchmarking

Edited by Jaap de Koning

This book argues that active labour market policies are necessary to improve the position of the unemployed but have so far performed relatively poorly. The contributing authors seek ways to improve active labour market policy and consider three means of doing so: improving the quality by better targeting and by better-designed measures, more efficient implementation and delivery, and better performance by benchmarking the various implementation agencies involved.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: Private versus Public Provision of Placement Services for Hard-to-Place Unemployed: An Impact Evaluation

Lennart Delander, Jonas Månsson and Erik Nyberg


Lennart Delander, Jonas Månsson and Erik Nyberg 1 INTRODUCTION Since the deregulation of private employment services in Sweden, temporary job agencies have been the establishments in that sector which have commanded most attention in the public debate.1 It has been argued, for example, that they have more and better contacts with employers than public employment offices. It has also been claimed that their hiring out of workers could be used within the framework of labour market policy to increase the chances of the unemployed finding a job.2 This would also apply, it has been contended, to job seekers who have difficulty in obtaining employment, since client employers would have the chance of testing them and seeing their skills. So it has been advocated that the Labour Market Administration should contract out placement services for the hard-to-place unemployed to private temporary agencies.3 The hard-toplace population is, of course, very heterogeneous (for definitions and characteristics of hard-to-place groups see Erhel et al, 1996, p. 281), but proponents of private provision of placement services for the hard-to-place in Sweden singled out as a proper target group the unemployed with an immigrant background who are overrepresented among the long-term unemployed at public employment offices. Allegedly weak incentives for public employment office employees to be innovative in the placement services they provide for this group of job seekers were advanced as an argument for the superiority of private provision of such services (cf. Schleifer, 1998, p. 138). The essence...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.