Strategic Competition, Dynamics, and the Role of the State
Show Less

Strategic Competition, Dynamics, and the Role of the State

A New Perspective

Jamee K. Moudud

Jamee Moudud provides a new microfoundational explanation for the Harrodian long-run or warranted growth rate. The author, emphasizing the role of Keynesian uncertainty, shows that the growth model is anchored in a new interpretation of the Oxford Economists’ Research Group’s microeconomic analysis and a variant of the stock-flow consistent framework. In a distinctly Kaldorian vein, Jamee Moudud discusses the relationship between capital budgeting, public investment, and taxation policy as it relates to the warranted growth rate and its impact on long-term involuntary unemployment.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 5: Warranted Growth and the Role of the State

Jamee K. Moudud


INTRODUCTION Conventional discussions of Harrod’s (and Domar’s) growth framework generally emphasize their Keynesian features and tend to focus on the modeling of instability. While these aspects of the Harrod–Domar model are important, this secondary literature generally does not deal with the policy aspects of these authors’ framework, especially the fact that the so-called paradox of thrift is overturned in the long run, although this is a feature of their models which both authors emphasized. As shown analytically in the previous chapter, Harrod’s position was that a change in the savings rate has opposite effects on the cyclical and trend components of growth. It is worth quoting at length from an undated letter that Harrod wrote to Joan Robinson regarding the relationship between savings, investment and growth (Besomi, 2006, p. 29): Your letter continues to ignore the vital distinction between movements in actual growth and movements in warranted growth – both being quite different from natural growth, which is the essence of my theory. An increase at a point of time in the ‘desire of firms to accumulate’ is a depressant of actual growth. This is Keynes, and I remain a Keynesian in this respect. An increase in the desire of firms to accumulate, to the extent that this is not ephemeral and shortly to be reversed, raises the warranted rate. This is neither Keynesian nor anti-Keynesian, because it is a dynamic principle, and there is no dynamics in Keynes. I explained that there is no dynamics in Keynes in my...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.