Handbook of Economics and Ethics
Show Less

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren

The Handbook of Economics and Ethics portrays an understanding of economic methodology in which facts and values, though distinct, are closely interconnected in a variety of ways. From theory building to data collection, and from modelling to policy evaluation, this encyclopaedic Handbook is at the intersection of economics and ethics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: Aristotle

Ricardo Crespo


Ricardo Crespo Introduction In his Lives of the Philosophers, Diogenes Laertius depicts a very well-known portrait of Aristotle’s life and work, characterizing him as a morally good person. Diogenes transcribes Aristotle’s last will and testament, in which the philosopher expressed in detail the caring for his relatives and freeing of his slaves. This concern for all of them reflects the non-ethereal nature of his Ethics, which is firmly rooted and embedded in matter and time. Diogenes writes of Aristotle’s teachings, ‘virtue was not sufficient of itself to confer happiness; for that it had also need of the goods of the body, and of the external goods’. Hence, we are obliged to look after not only virtue but also these goods. According to Aristotle, as quoted by Diogenes, ‘things which are ethical . . . concern politics, and economy, and laws’. In effect, Aristotle conceived economics as one of the practical sciences (epistèmè praktikè), which were the ethical sciences. For him, the highest practical science was politics, to which economics, as the other practical sciences, was subordinated. However, we must clarify two points. First, the connection between economics and ethics, according to Aristotle, is not direct and intrinsic. Aristotle used the term oikonomikè, here translated as ‘the economic’. Second, strictly speaking, Aristotle’s concept of ‘the economic’ differs from today’s economics. At the beginning of an article on the Aristotelian notion of economy, Christian Rutten (1987, p. 289) notes the following: Firstly, ‘the economic’ of Aristotle does not correspond at all with that that...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.