Handbook of Economics and Ethics
Show Less

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

Edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren

The Handbook of Economics and Ethics portrays an understanding of economic methodology in which facts and values, though distinct, are closely interconnected in a variety of ways. From theory building to data collection, and from modelling to policy evaluation, this encyclopaedic Handbook is at the intersection of economics and ethics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 31: Human Development

Des Gasper


Des Gasper ‘Human development’ language and the UNDP The language of ‘human development’ spread gradually within the circles of national and international development policy and planning from the 1970s onwards. It acquired its definitive form in the 1990s in the United Nations Development Programme’s Human Development Reports. These publications defined human development as an extension of people’s capabilities, the range of alternatives that they can attain and have reason to value. The initiator of the Human Development Reports was the Pakistani development economist and planner Mahbub ul Haq (1934–98). Haq had been an apostle of overriding priority being given to economic growth and industrialization when he was a leading official in Pakistan’s Planning Commission in the 1960s. He observed there, however, that despite economic growth of 6–7 per cent per annum throughout the decade priority aspects of human welfare went untouched. Social tensions in Pakistan brought the disintegration of the country in 1971, and hobbled its growth for the next decade. As director of the World Bank’s Policy Planning Department through the 1970s, Haq gradually widened his conception of development, in consultation with a global network of academics and policymakers. Within the World Bank he promoted a focus on basic needs, viewed as food, water, clothing, shelter, health and education. In retrospect that work on basic needs came to be seen as having at least six fundamental limitations. The first is its preoccupation with material inputs rather than more broadly with how people can live. The second is...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.