Handbook of Economics and Ethics
Show Less

Handbook of Economics and Ethics

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Jan Peil and Irene van Staveren

The Handbook of Economics and Ethics portrays an understanding of economic methodology in which facts and values, though distinct, are closely interconnected in a variety of ways. From theory building to data collection, and from modelling to policy evaluation, this encyclopaedic Handbook is at the intersection of economics and ethics.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 49: Positive versus Normative Economics

Eric van de Laar and Jan Peil

Extract

Eric van de Laar and Jan Peil Introduction Since its beginnings economics has been criticized for intermingling science with ethicopolitical discourses. Substitution of the worldview of modern science for the moral philosophical perspective made obsolete the old unifying approach to understanding economic life. This change in perspective raised questions about how to draw a demarcation line between science – that is, the search for positive knowledge of the world out there – and non-science – that is, discourses about politics and opinions, values and beliefs. How economics accommodated the criticism in the nineteenth century is illustrated by John Stuart Mill’s reinterpretation of Adam Smith, after Ricardo’s twist towards an abstract-deductive approach. Smith discussed problems of production and distribution of wealth in a unifying framework of moral philosophy, while Ricardo understood the economy as governed by fixed, immutable laws. Mill tried to disentangle these parts, referring to the distinction between positive economic analysis – science – and normative judgements. Mill ([1844] 1874) shared Ricardo’s view that science was about universal laws, but he opposed the idea that both production and distribution of wealth were determined by rigid laws. Mill did conceive the production of wealth as law-governed, but he understood the distribution of wealth as governed by rules embedded in customs and institutions. So, in his approach the production of wealth became the domain of positive economic analysis, while discussions about the distribution of wealth were conceived as exchanges of normative judgements, labelled ‘normative economics’.1 Mill saw no problem in economists dealing with both wealth production...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.