EU Internet Law
Show Less

EU Internet Law

Andrej Savin

This timely and detailed book is a state of the art overview of Internet law in the EU, and in particular of the EU regulatory framework which applies to the Internet. At the same time it serves as a critical evaluation of the EU’s policy and governance methods and a comparative analysis, mainly contrasting American with EU solutions.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 3: International jurisdiction and applicable law

Andrej Savin


One of the most important and most difficult questions surrounding the Internet concerns resolving civil disputes in regular courts. The claim that the Internet should be subject to regular civil courts and regular civil procedure today seems natural although it has not always been so. In its early days, it was thought that the Internet, inherently present or accessible ‘everywhere’, makes the traditional premises upon which private international law rests unworkable.1 Courts ought to exercise care, these arguments ran, when they assume jurisdiction over web pages not connected in any way with their own forum. The Internet is borderless and should not be subject to the same rules as regular transactions.2 It would be impossible or improper to impose local jurisdiction and local laws on a global phenomenon with little or no local presence.3 The courts should let the Internet develop as freely as possible and should approach the issue with an eye for the medium’s particular qualities. Today, few if any of these claims have support. The courts do assert jurisdiction locally over absent defendants who post globally and apply national laws to trans-border cases. Since the majority of situations in a cyberspace setting differ little from their non-electronic counterparts there are today no separate private international law rules for cyberspace, although newer instruments (such as the Brussels I Regulation and the Rome II Regulation, discussed below) do recognize some situations specific to electronic communications. In spite of the willingness to take Internet disputes, both the courts and the litigants keep struggling to understand

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.