Edited by Laura Anna Costanzo and Robert Bradley MacKay
Chapter 7: Scenarios as Knowledge Transformed into Strategic ‘Re-presentations’: The Use of Foresight Studies to Help Shape and Implement Strategy
Thomas Durand Introduction Future studies contribute to gaining insight into the context in which organizations maneuver. In this sense, future studies are essential inputs to the strategy process, when an organization envisages its future activities and its competitive positioning. It may be argued that ‘future studies’ are as important ingredients of the making of strategy as competitive intelligence, market surveys, technology assessment or identiﬁcation of core competence. Future studies and foresight will be used as equivalent terms here. However, the French tradition of future studies is known as ‘La Prospective’, and it derives from Gaston Berger’s work in the 1950s (Berger, 1957, 1958, 1964). Berger wrote about ‘l’attitude prospective’ (the foresight stance) which soon became as substantive as La Prospective: Observing an atom modiﬁes the atom; watching a person aﬀects the person; looking at the future transforms the future. Tomorrow will not be like yesterday. It will be new and shaped by us. The future is less to be discovered than invented. The past, the present and the future are intricately interwoven as they impact each other. (1964) Subsequent contributions came from Jacques Lesourne (1981) and Michel Godet (1977, 1985, 1991, 2001) from their years at Sema, or André Gros and Armand Braun (2001) known as ‘conseillers de synthèse’ at Sics. Gros founded the journal Prospective with Gaston Berger in 1957. In turn Bertrand de Jouvenel (1967) founded the review Futuribles in 1975. Over the years, this became one of the vehicles of publications on future...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.