Money, Investment and Consumption
Show Less

Money, Investment and Consumption

Keynes’s Macroeconomics Rethought

Omar F. Hamouda

Contrary to the commonly perpetuated belief that Keynes’s theory is appropriate only to economic depressions, the author of this provocative book maintains that Keynes provided a complete set of macroeconomic relations and the ingredients of a new theoretical model, much more reflective of and analytically appropriate to the 21st century than those on which current macroeconomics is based.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 6: Inflation/Deflation and the Policy of the General General Theory

Omar F. Hamouda


In terms of its immediate reception, one of the most devastating and damaging impacts of Hicks’s interpretation of Keynes’s General Theory had been to make of Keynes’s 1936 work a story (not a theory) of Depression. Hicks’s reading of The General Theory was centred on the issue of wages as determinant of employment in circumstances where prices are irrelevant, since he thought Keynes assumed them fixed. Without challenging scrutiny, this interpretation became that of the profession, to which it immediately responded almost by open consensus. Hicks’s reworking of The General Theory was coupled with the easy acceptance of Hayek’s and Robertson’s attacks on the Treatise, making that contribution of Keynes even less read than The General Theory and quickly dismissed and forgotten by most. The combination gave the impression that Keynes had little to say about, among other things, inflation and deflation. It is not surprising thus to read that Tibor Scitovsky at the Keynes’s Centenary Conference in 1983, a gathering which was designed to assess the general contribution of Keynes, stated bluntly, ‘Inflation was not a problem Keynes gave much thought to’ (Worswick and Trevithick, 1983, p. 223). John M. Fleming, his discussant, rightly responded, ‘This is an extraordinary proposition to make’, but Fleming, himself, under the influence of the Hicksian tradition of Keynesianism, went on to characterize the argument of The General Theory as centred around wages as cause rather than effect (Worswick and Trevithick, 1983, p. 223). It is ironic that Hubert Henderson in June 1936, just...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.