How it Works, Ideas for Making it Work Better
Chapter 1: Neoliberalism or Regulatory Capitalism?
1 REGULATION AND NETWORKED GOVERNANCE States can be thought of as providing, distributing and regulating.2 They bake cakes, slice them, and proﬀer pieces as inducements to steer events. Regulation is conceived as that large subset of governance that is about steering the ﬂow of events, as opposed to providing and distributing.3 Of course, when regulators regulate, they often steer the providing and distributing that regulated actors supply. We build on Jacint Jordana and David Levi-Faur’s (2003; 2004) systematic evidence that, since 1980, states have become rather more preoccupied with the regulation part of governance and less with providing.4 Yet non-state regulation has grown even more rapidly, so it is not best to conceive of the era in which we live as one of the regulatory state, but of regulatory capitalism (Levi-Faur 2005a). This involves expansion of the scope, arenas, instruments and depth of regulation (Levi-Faur et al. 2005). Levi-Faur (2005a) identiﬁes transitions from laissez-faire capitalism (1800s–1930s) to welfare capitalism (1930s–1970s) to regulatory capitalism (1970s on). This chapter seeks to reﬁne somewhat the transitions from feudalism to more welfarist and regulatory capitalisms. Governance is a wider set of control activities than government. Students of the state noticed that government has shifted from ‘government of a unitary state to governance in and by networks’ (Bevir and Rhodes 2003: 1; Rhodes 1997). But because the informal authority of networks in civil society not only supplements but also supplants the formal authority of government, Bevir, Rhodes and others in...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.