Chapter 9: Is There a Policy Conclusion?
One of the main motivations behind this book was observation of the mushrooming body of uncoordinated anti-hate related legislation in the major western democracies. So it is appropriate that we now come to look at what narrow and wider microeconomics has to say about this and also ﬁnally wrap up by asking what we now think hate is. In Chapters 2 and 3 we covered the canvas of mainstream microeconomics which brings fairly obvious policy conclusions as far as eﬀectiveness goes; the simple message is to use some kind of price signals. The extreme deterrent would be the death penalty as befell Sadam Hussein. Execution and all lesser measures are expected to work on the grounds that haters can be treated as rational actors who treat punishments as ‘prices’ of their undesired activities. This is a well-trodden path in the large economics of crime literature. Optimal government policy would seek to maximize the net social beneﬁt of prevention. One implication of such a ‘raspberry jam’ approach is that we can assign monetary values to the consequences of hate. For example, we might take slavery or pornography as forms of hatred (although this inevitably opens up again the deﬁnitional mineﬁeld). We can then look at the psychic costs, external eﬀects and transactions costs. Slavery aﬀords a good example of the subtleties of the issue. This became a celebrated notorious research topic in economic history due to work which claimed that slavery, in the USA, was...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.