Accountability, Parliamentarism and Transparency in the EU
Show Less

Accountability, Parliamentarism and Transparency in the EU

The Role of National Parliaments

Adam Cygan

Adam Cygan analyses the impact of subsidiarity monitoring upon national parliaments and to what extent this provides new opportunities for national parliaments to be engaged in, and exert influence over, the EU legislative process. While the post-Lisbon position of national parliaments may have improved, this book questions whether national parliaments can really be considered as central actors in EU affairs. The author also queries whether subsidiarity monitoring has the capacity to create a collective bloc of horizontal actors which exert effective accountability over the EU legislative process.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: National parliaments after Lisbon: A new dawn of accountability or remaining on the periphery?

The Role of National Parliaments

Adam Cygan


Parliaments remain central institutions in European systems of government. Notwithstanding the process of integration and Europeanisation, national parliaments retain their constitutional position within Member States and the need for their consent to approve each new Treaty reiterates that national parliaments retain a constitutional relevance. National parliaments also remain the embodiment of the nation State. The inclusion of Article 50 TEU within the Treaty of Lisbon to some extent underlines this point, by providing a withdrawal clause for Member States. This implies that withdrawal from the EU by a Member State is an issue which a national parliament can unilaterally determine without the need for prior consent from the EU. While this suggests that the nation State remains a central concept within the EU, not too much should be read into the inclusion of Article 50 TEU within the Treaty. First, it offers no new powers for national parliaments; withdrawal from the EU could have been achieved prior to the Treaty of Lisbon and the main development of Article 50 TEU is that this exit clause offers the prospect of an orderly procedure for withdrawal. Secondly, confirming the relevance of national parliaments in the EU by reference to a Treaty provision that provides for the withdrawal of a Member State cannot be said to improve either legislative accountability or EU democracy. Therefore, while Article 50 TEU confirms that the EU remains a supra-national organisation made up of nation States, it is questionable whether this provision will encourage national parliaments to conclude that their democratic parliamentary credentials are any more relevant to EU integration than before the Treaty of Lisbon.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.