Making European Private Law
Show Less

Making European Private Law

Governance Design

Edited by Fabrizio Cafaggi and Horatia Muir Watt

This book covers various perspectives on the challenge of designing governance for EPL: the implications of a multi-level system in terms of competences, the interplay between market integration and regulation, the legitimacy of private law making, the importance of self-regulation, the usefulness of conflict of law rules, the role of intergovernmental institutions, and the aftermath of enlargement. In addressing these, the book’s achievements are to successfully link two areas of scholarship that have so far remained separate, EPL and new modes of governance, and to address institutional reforms. The contributions offer different proposals to improve governance: the creation of a European Law institute, the improvement of judicial cooperation among national courts, the use of committees for implementation of EPL.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: The American Law Institute: A Model for the New Europe?

Lance Liebman


Lance Liebman The American Law Institute (ALI) was founded in 1923.1 Scholars have reached diverse conclusions about the Institute’s early history.2 One viewer, N.E.H. Hull, sees the curtain rising in 1906 with Roscoe Pound’s address to the American Bar Association in St Paul, Minnesota.3 Pound spoke about ‘the causes of dissatisfaction with the system of justice’. He described and analyzed defects in the US justice system, caught an important mood of criticism, and influenced reform undertakings that lasted for half a century. Pound denounced the American court system as ‘archaic’, its procedures as ‘behind the times’, and state legislation as ‘crude’.4 Pound represented a progressive policy-minded reaction to Christopher Columbus Langdell’s 1887 declaration that ‘law is a science, and . . . all the available materials of that science are contained in printed books’.5 The propositions stated in appellate opinions cannot assure a legal system that offers 1 UNIDROIT, headquartered in Rome, was founded three years later with a similar goal: to pursue coherence in European law. 2 See, for example, William Draper Lewis, How We Did It (1945); N.E.H. Hull, ‘Restatement and Reform: A New Perspective on the Origins of the American Law Institute’ Law and History Review, 8, 55 (1990); G. Edward White, ‘The American Law Institute and the Triumph of Modernist Jurisprudence’ Law and History Review, 15, 1 (1997); Ellen Condliffe Lagemann, Conceptualists vs. Realists: An Institute to Restate the Law, from The Politics of Knowledge: The Carnegie Corporation, Philanthropy, and Public Policy (1989). 3 N.E.H. Hull (2000), at p....

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.