Problems and Progress
Edited by Colin Robinson
Supply security in electricity and natural gas markets 117 CHAIRMAN’S COMMENTS Sir John Mogg Notwithstanding that Paul is a non-executive director of National Grid Transco (NGT), there’s no such thing as regulatory capture. I admit to blushing on behalf of my predecessors for the accolades that Paul has rained upon the UK regulatory framework. His opening remarks that it sets an international gold standard for gas and electricity, within a liberalised context, are very ﬂattering. It would not be surprising that I welcome and support the general thesis, notably that there is no inherent conﬂict between having a liberalised markets regime and security of supply. We are at a crucial moment notably, winter 2006, the severity of the weather is unknown but the position is perhaps better than in 2005. But Paul made the important caveat, about the devil being in the detail; that you need to have crucially an appropriate set of market rules; an appropriate industry structure, and regulatory institutions to manage the process. Non-intervention requires the right sort of structure. Among the case studies, that of New Jersey made me freeze with anxiety. My view is of a practical regulator, with the experience of our tiny blackouts just a few weeks before I took over, and how we have beneﬁted from those, fortunately very rare events – to deliver the National Grid’s transmission record, which is 99.99999 per cent of security conﬁdence. We must learn from what happened and how that could be avoided. But...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.