Chapter 4: Measuring Money Laundering for Australia and the Netherlands with Melissa Siegel and Joras Ferwerda
4. Measuring Money Laundering for Australia and the Netherlands 1 With Melissa Siegel and Joras Ferwerda 4.1. THE CONTROVERSY ON GLOBAL MONEY LAUNDERING – IS IT BIG OR SMALL? Before measuring money laundering for specific countries, one has to face the principle question of whether it can be measured on a large scale at all. The calculations of international flows of money laundered streaming into a country depend on worldwide money laundering, which again depends on the amount of worldwide crime and the proceeds of crime. So, one must rely on some of the international estimates regarding the global proceeds of crime and money laundering in order to say something about specific countries. The question is, how much can one trust the global estimates? Global money laundering estimates are based on estimates of global crime and its proceeds. There seems to be a controversy going on between those who believe that the proceeds of crime and money laundering are small compared to other sectors of the economy, and those who believe that they are huge. This chapter supports the view that money laundering is sizeable. This view conforms to International Organizations such as the United Nations and the International Monetary Fund (IMF), which see global crime and global money laundering as a huge problem. The UNDP (1996, p. 3) showed that the estimated annual illicit drug turnover in the 1990s was about US$400 billion, 6 times higher than official development aid (US$69 billion in 1995). The drug sector accounts...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.