Economic Reform in Developing Countries
Show Less

Economic Reform in Developing Countries

Reach, Range, Reason

Edited by José María Fanelli and Lyn Squire

This book offers insights into the process of economic reform in developing countries. It is organized around three factors that are critical to the success of any reform. According to Nobel Laureate Amartya Sen, these key dimensions are Reach, Range, and Reason. ‘Reach’ refers to the ability of reform to be person-centered and evenhanded, reaching all individuals in society. ‘Range’ considers the institutional reforms and policy changes necessary to implement change and the possible ripple effects on other policies and populations. Finally, ‘Reason’ captures the importance of constantly asking why a particular reform has been selected.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 10: The Performance of State-Owned Enterprises and Newly Privatized Firms: Does Privatization Really Matter?

Mohammed Omran


Mohammed Omran Privatization has become a major political and economic phenomenon, and scholars continue to explore the theoretical and empirical dimensions of the subject. In particular, analysts are asking a fundamental question: Why privatize? Reducing the size of the public sector has been one important motive for reform, particularly in the former socialist and communist economies. But a motive expressed in such general terms can hardly be a convincing reason to justify privatization, especially given the distributive effects usually induced by state divestiture. As Amartya Sen argues, reformers must have a reason to seek a reform. That is, there must be a motive to modify unsatisfactory institutional arrangements and policies and a reason for choosing the priorities to pursue. The goal of this chapter is to analyze this problem using the Egyptian privatization experience. Between 1960 and 1990, state-owned enterprises (SOEs) handled most of Egypt’s economic activity under the direction of various ministries. Poor management and weak capitalization inevitably had a negative effect on SOE efficiency and financial viability (Road 1997). Egypt launched a privatization program in 1991 to improve its economy. The first step in Egypt’s privatization program was to cut off subsidies to SOEs (Field 1995). In 1991 Egypt’s 314 SOEs were grouped under 27 holding companies (reduced to 14 by 2001) responsible for all the affiliates in various sectors. The government initially used three approaches to divest the SOEs: selling shares through the domestic stock market, selling strategic stakes of shares to anchor investors through public auction...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.