Corporate Rescue Law – An Anglo-American Perspective
Show Less

Corporate Rescue Law – An Anglo-American Perspective

Gerard McCormack

This book offers an unprecedented and detailed comparative critique of Anglo-American corporate bankruptcy law. It challenges the standard characterisation that US law in the sphere of corporate bankruptcy is ‘pro-debtor’ and UK law is ‘pro-creditor’, and suggests that the traditional thesis is, at best, a potentially misleading over-simplification. Gerard McCormack offers the conclusion that there is functional convergence in practice, while acknowledging that corporate rescue, as distinct from business rescue, still plays a larger role in the US. The focus is on corporate restructurings with in-depth scrutiny of Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code and the UK Enterprise Act, and offers other comparative oversights.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Corporate Restructuring Law in the UK

Gerard McCormack


1. Introduction This book compares and contrasts corporate rescue (reorganisation) procedures in the UK and the US. A dedicated corporate rescue procedure has existed in the UK since the 1980s in the form of administration, or at least administration coupled with a company voluntary arrangement (CVA). In the US, corporate rescue law is much older, with the law now contained in Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code 1978. In 2002, by means of the Enterprise Act, UK law was moved in the US direction. US law in this area has traditionally been seen as very ‘pro-debtor’ compared with the UK, which is seen as ‘pro-creditor’.1 Part of the theme of the book is that this generalisation is, at best, a potentially misleading over-simplification. The book will ask a number of questions including the following: 1. Firstly, what values and purposes are served by reorganisation procedures? Such procedures are generally premised on the assumption that the ‘going-concern’ value of a business is greater than the liquidation value. The question arises, however, whether the concern of the law should simply be about creditor wealth maximisation or whether a business should be kept alive for other reasons. Related to this is the issue of the destination of the ‘surplus’ value that is captured during the reorganisation process. In distributing this ‘surplus’ value, is the law simply interested in respecting pre-insolvency legal entitlements or should a different set of interests enter into the equation during the reorganisation process? Why are the mechanisms for...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.