Setting Priorities for HIV/AIDS Interventions
Show Less

Setting Priorities for HIV/AIDS Interventions A Cost–Benefit Approach

A Cost–Benefit Approach

Robert J. Brent

HIV/AIDS is much too complex a phenomenon to be understood only by reference to common sense and ethical codes. This book presents the cost–benefit analysis (CBA) framework in a well-researched and accessible manner to ensure that the most important considerations are recognized and incorporated.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 14: Education as a Factor Raising HIV Rates

Robert J. Brent

Extract

14. Education as a factor raising HIV rates Here we examine the second of the paradoxes (income was the first) that was found in the Brent (2006) study of 31 SSA countries. This paradox involves the positive relation between female education and HIV rates. We will focus on just female education given that the majority of HIV cases in SSA involve women and gender-specific interventions would seem to be more likely to be important for the African HIV epidemic. As with the income paradox, there are many good reasons for thinking that the relationship between education and HIV should be negative. As the initial attempt to reconcile the paradox turns out to be incomplete, we will fill in the blanks to provide a second explanation that has more immediate policy significance. The story has a “happy ending” because of the joint interaction between income and education that was highlighted in the last chapter. REASONS FOR A POSITIVE EDUCATION/HIV LINK In the exploratory statistical study by Over (1998) of what determines HIV rates in 72 countries, he not only found the income effect discussed in the last chapter, he also found a particular education effect – that the greater the gap between female and male enrollment rates, the higher the country’s HIV rate. So if female enrollments could be made to rise relative to those of males, HIV rates can be reduced. A subsequent World Bank group study (World Bank, 2002, p. xvii), took the result for the male– female literacy gap...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.