Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth
Show Less

Handbook of Alternative Theories of Economic Growth

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by Mark Setterfield

Comprising specially commissioned essays, the Handbook provides a comprehensive overview of alternative theories of economic growth. It surveys major sub-fields (including classical, Kaleckian, evolutionary, and Kaldorian growth theories) and highlights cutting-edge issues such as the relationship between finance and growth, the interplay of trend and cycle, and the role of aggregate demand in the long run.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 17: Profit Sharing, Capacity Utilization and Growth in a Post-Keynesian Macromodel

Gilberto Tadeu Lima

Extract

17 Profit sharing, capacity utilization and growth in a post-Keynesian macromodel Gilberto Tadeu Lima* 1 Introduction Though Weitzman’s (1983, 1984, 1985) claim that profit sharing is able to generate full employment and low inflation has not led to its widespread adoption, alternative employee compensation mechanisms have nonetheless become increasingly common in industrialized economies since the 1980s. Weitzman argued that while a wage economy is prone to unemployment in the short run, a profit-sharing economy experiences excess demand for labor. If some part of workers’ compensation is received as a profit share and if, as a result, the base wage is lower than otherwise, firms face a lower marginal cost of labor. Profit-maximizing monopolistically competitive firms will then be willing to hire more workers and given a sufficient degree of profit sharing, an excess demand for labor results. As the marked up price is lower than in a wage economy, a resulting real balance effect leads to a higher aggregate demand and therefore to a higher desired output.1 Weitzman’s propositions about the macroeconomic benefits of profit sharing have often been criticized by economists of different persuasions, and a common heterodox criticism is that Weitzman ignored the truly Keynesian factors of uncertainty and deficient effective demand and implicitly assumed that involuntary unemployment is caused by downward wage inflexibility (see, e.g., Davidson, 1986–87; Rothschild, 1986–87). However well taken these criticisms may be, and the one just mentioned surely is, they do not imply that profit sharing per se should necessarily be...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.