Handbook of University-wide Entrepreneurship Education
Show Less

Handbook of University-wide Entrepreneurship Education

  • Elgar original reference

Edited by G. Page West III, Elizabeth J. Gatewood and Kelly G. Shaver

This Handbook explores the current state of university-wide entrepreneurship education programs and provides a comprehensive reference guide for the planning and implementation of an entrepreneurship curriculum beyond the business school environment. A variety of authors spanning five countries and multiple disciplines discuss the opportunities and universal challenges in extending entrepreneurship education to the sciences, performing arts, social sciences, humanities, and liberal arts environments. The Handbook is designed to assist educators in developing new programs and pedagogical approaches based upon the previous experiences of others who have forged this exciting new path.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details

Chapter 1: Legitimacy Across the University: Yet Another Entrepreneurial Challenge

G. Page West, Elizabeth J. Gatewood and Kelly G. Shaver

Extract

1 Legitimacy across the university: yet another entrepreneurial challenge G. Page West III, Elizabeth J. Gatewood and Kelly G. Shaver Introduction It is hard enough to build a strong entrepreneurship program within a school of business. For a quarter of a century those who pursued such programs have faced questions about legitimacy. Is the field of entrepreneurship a unique domain of teaching and research ( Shane and Venkataraman, 2000; Busenitz et al., 2003)? Are the rigor, methods and cumulative nature of entrepreneurship research consistent with those observed in other academic disciplines (Aldrich and Baker, 1997; Low, 2001)? Has entrepreneurship research and teaching had real impact (Bygrave, 1994)? Is there consistent pedagogy for teaching the subject matter and is there consistent and rigorous training available to produce quality instructors (Brush et al., 2003)? Often perceived as lacking both sociopolitical legitimacy and cognitive legitimacy (Aldrich and Fiol, 1993), many entrepreneurship academics have been thought of as ‘fools rushing in’ – by others who question their wisdom in devoting time and energy to a field that does not enjoy status as a ‘discipline’ (Ogbor, 2000), as well as sometimes even by themselves. Yet during this period entrepreneurship programs in business schools first blossomed, then experienced explosive growth. Entrepreneurship courses are now taught in more than 2000 universities in the US (Cone, 2008) and over 225 business schools offer majors or concentrations in the field (Katz, 2005). There are now a number of PhD programs conferring terminal degrees in entrepreneurship and many more in which entrepreneurship...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.