Strategic Reconfigurations
Show Less

Strategic Reconfigurations

Building Dynamic Capabilities in Rapid Innovation-based Industries

Edited by Stuart Wall, Carsten Zimmermann, Ronald Klingebiel and Dieter Lange

This path-breaking book provides unique insights into the organisational realities of strategic reconfigurations in uncertain markets, thus advancing the dynamic capability perspective.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 8: Deploying Strategic Initiatives: Further Consideration of the Flexibility–Stability Balance

Ronald Klingebiel


Ronald Klingebiel ABSTRACT When drafting the plans for the rollout of strategic initiatives, firms consistently make decisions about the balance of flexibility and stability. Which elements of the project design should be defined in the planning phase (stable); when should commitment to a particular element be delayed until later during the rollout (flexible)? Central to this decision is the value of flexibility. This chapter reviews the current state of project planning concepts and real options theory to identify where they respectively succeed or fail to explain effective managerial decision-making. I use a simple illustration of a planning decision problem to explore the boundary conditions of flexibility value, i.e. under which conditions is it beneficial to create and maintain flexibility in the rollout of the strategic initiative. These conditions include (a) external and internal parameters such as uncertainty and complexity, and (b) a firm’s skills and routines for dealing with flexibility once it is created. Through a synthesis of these ‘general’ and ‘organisation-specific’ conditions, I point towards an extended conceptual framework for the managerial assessment of flexibility value. Using this, I argue that the project planning literature insufficiently and only indirectly considers flexibility value and its conditions. On the other hand, using real options concepts to describe managerial decision-making heuristics focuses too heavily upon general parameters, and too little upon organisation-specific conditions that influence flexibility value. I advocate a combination of project risk management with elements of real options theory, which may be better suited to explain managerial decision-making under uncertainty...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.