- Advances in Regulatory Economics series
Edited by Michael A. Crew and Paul R. Kleindorfer
Chapter 12: National Postal Strategies after a Full Postal Market Opening
Gonzales d’Alcantara and Axel Gautier 1. INTRODUCTION In October 2006 the European Commission presented to the European Parliament and the Council of Ministers a proposal for a Directive1 modifying Directive 97/67/CE2 and 2002/39/EC3 to open fully the postal market in the European Union by January 1, 2009. In a vote on the proposal and amendments on July 11, 2007, the European Parliament modiﬁed this proposal with a few additional conditions, but postponing the date to 2011–13 (with most of the EU-15 members subject to the 2011 date and new members and countries like Greece and Luxembourg facing special conditions subject to the 2013 date). This proposal requires Full Postal Market Opening (FMO) in all EU member states and the obligation for all member states to provide a Universal Postal Service, including postal delivery every day, to every address and at an aﬀordable price. The proposal foresees the possibility that losses for a National Postal Operator (PO) as a result of its Universal Service Obligation (USO) may need to be ﬁnanced by various means, including a state subsidy. Let us assume that this Directive is also accepted by the European Parliament and that, within this context, all member states have to specify a well-deﬁned USO, a corresponding ﬁnancing mechanism and regulatory constraints. Such speciﬁcs will result from a national decision process involving three national players: the Incumbent (I) or historical Universal Service Provider (USP), an Entrant and a National Policy Maker (Regulator). We assume that the...
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.