The Genesis of Innovation
Show Less

The Genesis of Innovation

Systemic Linkages Between Knowledge and the Market

Edited by Blandine Laperche, Dimitri Uzunidis and G. N. von Tunzelmann

The genesis and diffusion of innovation depends upon the density of the cognitive and market relationships among individuals, organisations and institutions at both the micro- and macro-economic level. By addressing the nature of these relationships, which include cooperation, competition and power, this book presents an important and progressive enquiry into the economic and social origins of innovation.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 1: Towards a Communicative Theory of Innovation

Stefan Kesting


Stefan Kesting 1. INTRODUCTION The classical conceptualization and definition of innovation in economics originated in the works of Joseph Aloïs Schumpeter. Schumpeter emphasized that truly welfare-enhancing economic development is not based on a smooth adjustment from a slightly disturbed equilibrium to another, but is based on revolutionary innovations (Schumpeter [1911] 1934, p. 64). He defined innovation as new combinations which lead to new products, new ways of production, discoveries of new resources, new organizational methods of running the business enterprise and entry into new markets (Schumpeter [1911] 1934, p. 66). In the process of innovation, path-breaking inventions and discoveries (technical, managerial or others) are picked up by radical individuals called entrepreneurs and turned into commercial successes. Schumpeter assumed the ‘new’ was somehow emerging out of the blue or floating around (ibid., p. 88). The distinctive role of the entrepreneur is radically turning away from traditions, customs and routines and committing herself/himself to push for change. One of the few neoclassical economists who take discourse seriously, is McCloskey. She calculates that about a quarter of national income is produced by ‘persuasive talk’ (including, for example, advertising, see McCloskey and Klamer 1995, p. 194). In her book, Knowledge and Persuasion in Economics, she collects a bulk of evidence for the economic significance of persuasion under the heading ‘The economy as a conversation’. McCloskey (1994, p. 370) uses the example of Donald Trump to point to the power of persuasion and ‘the art of felicitous speech acts’ to close...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.