EU Competition Enforcement and Human Rights
Show Less

EU Competition Enforcement and Human Rights

Arianna Andreangeli

This book discusses the procedural rights enjoyed by those being investigated under Articles 81 and 82 of the EC Treaty and of the Merger Control Regulation, and their right to challenge the Commission’s decision in the Community Courts. It further assesses how their rights to ‘due process’ in competition proceedings before the European Commission comply with the notion of ‘administrative fairness’ enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights, in accordance with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 7: Conclusions: ‘Article 6-proofing’ EC Competition Proceedings?

Arianna Andreangeli


INTRODUCTION The previous chapters discussed the current standards governing the notion of a ‘fair procedure’ enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and Community law. With respect to the ECHR, the analysis of the case law indicated that, given the silence of the Convention, the Strasbourg Court constructed the notion of a ‘fair administrative procedure’ on the basis of the purposive interpretation of Article 6(1) ECHR and particularly of an extensive reading of the concepts of ‘determination of civil rights’ and ‘criminal charge’.1 The ECJ instead elaborated the basic tenets of that notion on the basis of the general principles of EC law and especially of the constitutional traditions common to the laws of the Member States.2 Having regard to competition proceedings, secondary legislation as well as administrative practices played a significant part in setting out rules governing hearings, access to the file and the protection of confidentiality of documents submitted to the Commission during both antitrust and merger control proceedings. The case law of the Community courts has also contributed to the current standards for the protection of the procedural rights of investigated firms by emphasising the importance of an effective right to be heard and to obtain access to the Commission’s case file in accordance with the principle of ‘equality of arms’ as well as the scope of its power of judicial review of both antitrust and merger decisions. However, the comparative analysis conducted in the earlier chapters illustrated that there are still significant areas of...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.