The World Trade Organization and Human Rights
Show Less

The World Trade Organization and Human Rights

Interdisciplinary Perspectives

Edited by Sarah Joseph, David Kinley and Jeff Waincymer

This collection of essays from leading academics examines the connection between the World Trade Organization (WTO) and human rights issues, a topic which has provoked significant debate, particularly in the decade since the collapsed WTO talks in Seattle in 1999.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 12: Democratic Deficit, Participation and the WTO

Sarah Joseph


Sarah Joseph This chapter will analyse arguments that the World Trade Organization (‘WTO’) suffers from a ‘democratic deficit’, which casts doubt on the legitimacy and desirability of its rules and policies. First, this chapter outlines the two strands of this accusation of ‘democratic deficit’. That is: 1. 2. That the WTO unduly undermines the regulatory capacity of States, and That democratic deficiencies exist within WTO internal processes, such as negotiations and dispute settlements. Secondly, I examine the relevance to this issue of international human rights law, particularly the right of political participation in Article 25 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966 (‘ICCPR’).1 Thirdly, many of the alleged democratic deficits of and within the WTO afflict other international regimes. In this regard, a comparison between the WTO regime and the international human rights regime is undertaken in order to identify whether democratic deficiencies within the WTO are of greater concern than the general democratic deficiencies that exist at the international level of governance. Fourthly, potential limits to the WTO’s mandate, which might strike a more appropriate balance between national regulatory powers and international rules in light of democratic deficiencies in WTO internal processes, are discussed. The fifth section concludes this chapter. 1. THE TWO COMPONENTS TO THE WTO/DEMOCRATIC DEFICIT ARGUMENT There are generally two strands to the ‘democratic deficit’ arguments. First, 1 International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature 16 December 1966, 999 UNTS 14668 (entered into force 23 March 1976). 313 314...

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.